Weather/North Carolina/Instruments/BDCN7
Beaverdam Creek
At a river or reservoir gauge in Buncombe County, North CarolinaAt a river or reservoir gauge
DCP network, identified by the register
- Identifier
- BDCN7
- Latitude
- 35.48080 N
- Longitude
- 82.69720 W
- Elevation
- -
- Listed
- Automatically, on 40 reports in 36 hours over the last seven days
- Observed
- 10:00 AMEDT, 23 hours ago
- Precipitation this hour
- -
- Precipitation today
- -
Now, today, and the week
On the radar over Beaverdam CreekReflectivityStorm topsRain rateRain, last 24 hoursForecast temperatureForecast rain totalEvery picture
Weather instrument stations by state
At a river or reservoir gauge
Drawn as the kind of place it stands at. 212 instruments in North Carolina stand at one.
What the snow tracker reads here
Every instrument in this state
-in
Snow on the ground
Station charts
Beaverdam Creek Report
Rank 2,232 of 2,255 in North Carolina, Oct 16. The 247 rank orders a state's stations by their 247 score out of 100: how reliably they report, how accurate their readings are against a reference station, how their readings pass their checks, and how they stand against the forecast.
Ranking Statistics
247 score60.5of 100
- North Carolina median
- 95.0the median score of 2,255 stations
- Scoring higher
- 2,231stations in North Carolina
- Sharing its score
- 1no other station
- Points deducted
- 39.529.9 reports received, 7.9 continuity, 1.7 arrival
- Counted at the median
- Accuracy, instrument checks, forecast checknot measured at this station; North Carolina median 100.0, 100.0, 100.0
- Next above
- FW8597rank 2,231; ahead on 247 score 60.6 against 60.5
- Next below
- CMTN7rank 2,233; behind on 247 score 60.5 against 60.1
Equal scores are ordered by the share of scheduled reports received, then the reports due in the week (the longer record first), then the median arrival, then the longest silence.
- Reports receivedweight 3514.75.1 of 35 pointsNorth Carolina median 92.640 of 272 scheduled reports received in 7 days
- Arrivalweight 1082.98.3 of 10 pointsNorth Carolina median 95.2half its reports arrived within 19 min
- Continuityweight 1020.62.1 of 10 pointsNorth Carolina median 100.0longest silence 23.1 h, on a schedule of one report every 37 min
- Accuracyweight 20-20.0 of 20 points, at the medianNorth Carolina median 100.0-
- Instrument checksweight 15-15.0 of 15 points, at the medianNorth Carolina median 100.0-
- Forecast checkweight 10-10.0 of 10 points, at the medianNorth Carolina median 100.0-
The score is the weighted mean of its six parts, from the last 7 days. How a station is ranked sets out each part.
How each part is scored
- Reports received
- Full marks for every scheduled report received, none for none, in proportion between
- Arrival
- Full marks for a median arrival within 10 min, none at 60 min
- Continuity
- Full marks for a longest silence of 3 reports or less (1.9 h), none for 72 (44.4 h)
- Accuracy
- Full marks within 1.5 °F of its reference, typically, none beyond 8.0 °F
- Instrument checks
- Full marks for no reading failed, none for 5 per cent or more
- Forecast check
- Full marks within 2 °F of the forecast on average, none at 8 °F
- Schedule
- every 37 min
- Reports received, 24 hours
- 2 of 385.2% of its schedule
- Reports received, 7 days
- 40 of 27214.7% of its schedule, 56 reports in all
- Days reported, 30 days
- 28 of 30
- Longest silence, 7 days
- 23 h 05 minfrom Oct 11, 10:00 AM
- Latest report
- Oct 15, 10:00 AMlocal time
- Time to reach Storm Station
- 19 min9 in 10 within 19 min
From Storm Station's own record of every report it heard from this station.
Its schedule is one report every 37 min, 38 in 24 hours. Two reports in the same 37 min count as one received.
The ranking these charts were drawn from, as tables
| Share of scheduled reports received | Stations |
|---|---|
| 100% | 551 |
| 90 to 99% | 591 |
| 80 to 89% | 200 |
| 70 to 79% | 156 |
| 60 to 69% | 199 |
| 50 to 59% | 286 |
| 40 to 49% | 178 |
| 30 to 39% | 10 |
| 20 to 29% | 46 |
| 10 to 19% | 26 |
| 0 to 9% | 12 |
| Day | Rank | Stations ranked | Share received |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2026 | 2,232 | 2,255 | 14.7% |
| Oct 15, 2026 | 2,226 | 2,253 | 14.7% |
| Oct 14, 2026 | 2,225 | 2,251 | 14.3% |
| Oct 13, 2026 | 2,239 | 2,255 | 12.2% |
| Oct 12, 2026 | 2,222 | 2,235 | 12.2% |
| Oct 11, 2026 | 2,194 | 2,229 | 11.4% |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1,971 | 2,181 | 36.3% |
| Oct 9, 2026 | 1,967 | 2,181 | 36.3% |
| Oct 8, 2026 | 1,847 | 2,202 | 36.3% |
| Oct 7, 2026 | 1,767 | 2,180 | 40.9% |
| Oct 6, 2026 | 1,966 | 1,980 | 8.1% |
| Oct 5, 2026 | 1,901 | 1,917 | 8.7% |
| Oct 4, 2026 | 1,525 | 1,659 | 36.3% |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 16 | 1,620 | 100.0% |
| Oct 2, 2026 | 16 | 1,620 | 100.0% |
| Oct 1, 2026 | 215 | 1,052 | 100.0% |
| Sep 30, 2026 | 116 | 1,043 | 100.0% |
| Sep 29, 2026 | 215 | 1,037 | 100.0% |
| Sep 28, 2026 | 210 | 1,010 | 100.0% |
The readings these charts were drawn from, as a table
| Day | Precipitation in |
|---|---|
| Oct 15 | 0.00 |
| Oct 14 | 0.00 |
| Oct 13 | 0.00 |
| Oct 12 | 0.00 |
| Oct 11 | 0.15 |
| Oct 10 | 0.99 |
| Oct 9 | 0.00 |
| Oct 8 | 0.00 |
| Oct 7 | 0.00 |
| Oct 5 | 0.00 |
| Oct 4 | 0.00 |
| Oct 3 | 0.04 |
| Oct 2 | 0.00 |
| Oct 1 | 0.00 |
| Sep 30 | 0.00 |
| Sep 29 | 0.00 |
| Sep 28 | 0.00 |
| Sep 27 | 0.00 |
| Sep 26 | 0.00 |
| Sep 25 | 0.00 |
| Sep 24 | 0.00 |
| Sep 23 | 0.04 |
| Sep 22 | 0.00 |
| Sep 21 | 0.08 |
| Sep 20 | 0.00 |
| Sep 19 | 0.04 |
| Sep 18 | 0.00 |
| Sep 17 | 0.00 |